GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs Radeon R7 M340

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking988not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMesoTU116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)7 July 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Compute units6no data
Core clock speed943 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1021 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate20.4289.04
Floating-point processing power0.6534 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 7 July 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 TU116 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M340 and GeForce GTX 1650 TU116. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M340 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M340
Radeon R7 M340
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 349 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 94 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M340 or GeForce GTX 1650 TU116, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.