GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs Radeon R7 M270DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking898not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTopazTU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 June 2014 (11 years ago)18 June 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384896
Core clock speed900 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5689.04
Floating-point processing power0.7219 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2456
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data14
L1 Cache96 KB896 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 June 2014 18 June 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 TU106 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M270DX and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M270DX is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M270DX
Radeon R7 M270DX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M270DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 303 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M270DX or GeForce GTX 1650 TU106, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.