ATI Radeon X1700 SE vs R7 M270
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 940 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | R500 (2005−2007) |
| GPU code name | Opal | RV560 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 January 2014 (11 years ago) | 30 November 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 950 million | 330 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 4.000 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6336 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | Not Listed | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | Not Listed | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.0 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 January 2014 | 30 November 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 80 nm |
R7 M270 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M270 and Radeon X1700 SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M270 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1700 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
