Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M vs AMD Radeon R7 M270
Combined performance score
Radeon R7 M270 outperforms Quadro NVS 5100M by 115% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 848 | 1080 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 0.04 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | GT2xx (2009−2012) |
GPU code name | Opal XT / Mars | N10P-NS |
Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2014 (10 years old) | 7 January 2010 (14 years old) |
Current price | no data | $105 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 550 MHz |
Number of transistors | 950 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | no data |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on Radeon R7 M270 and Quadro NVS 5100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | Not Listed | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 0 MB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | Not Listed | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
FreeSync | 1 | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | 10.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | Not Listed | no data |
Mantle | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon R7 M270 outperforms Quadro NVS 5100M by 115% in our combined benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Radeon R7 M270 outperforms Quadro NVS 5100M by 155% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 14
+133%
| 6−7
−133%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+22.2%
|
9−10
−22.2%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how R7 M270 and NVS 5100M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- R7 M270 is 133% faster than NVS 5100M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R7 M270 is 200% faster than the NVS 5100M.
All in all, in popular games:
- R7 M270 is ahead in 20 tests (80%)
- there's a draw in 5 tests (20%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.98 | 0.92 |
Recency | 7 January 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
The Radeon R7 M270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M270 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.