Playstation 5 Pro GPU vs Radeon R7 M270

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking893not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameOpalViola
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2014 (10 years ago)7 November 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843840
Core clock speed725 MHz2180 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors950 million10,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data232 Watt
Texture fill rate19.80564.0
Floating-point processing power0.6336 TFLOPS36.1 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Lengthno data386 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 11N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.2
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 January 2014 7 November 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm

Playstation 5 Pro GPU has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M270 and Playstation 5 Pro GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M270 is a notebook card while Playstation 5 Pro GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M270
Radeon R7 M270
AMD Playstation 5 Pro GPU
Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 21 vote

Rate Radeon R7 M270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 42 votes

Rate Playstation 5 Pro GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.