Radeon Instinct MI250X vs R7 M265DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1096not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameTopazAldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2014 (11 years ago)8 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38414080
Core clock speed925 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data500 Watt
Texture fill rate22.561,496
Floating-point processing power0.7219 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs24880
L1 Cache96 KB3.4 MB
L2 Cache256 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2014 8 November 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI250X has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M265DX and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M265DX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 128 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M265DX or Radeon Instinct MI250X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.