Radeon Graphics 512SP vs R7 M265DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1094not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTopazRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 October 2014 (11 years ago)7 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed925 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5667.20
Floating-point processing power0.7219 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2014 7 March 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M265DX and Radeon Graphics 512SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M265DX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 M265DX
Radeon R7 M265DX
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 29 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M265DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 93 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M265DX or Radeon Graphics 512SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.