RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon R7 M260DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking945not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameJetGB203
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2014 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3207680
Core clock speed780 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHz1702 MHz
Number of transistors690 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate17.10408.5
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS26.14 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs20240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache80 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data896.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded has a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M260DX and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 M260DX is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M260DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 M260DX or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.