Radeon RX 5950 XT vs R7 M260
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1073 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | Topaz | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 June 2014 (11 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 5120 |
| Compute units | 6 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 1635 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 21,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 350 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 523.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 16.74 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 96 |
| TMUs | 24 | 320 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 7 nm |
RX 5950 XT has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M260 and Radeon RX 5950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M260 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5950 XT is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
