ATI Radeon DDR VIVO SE vs R7 M260
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1078 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Rage 6 (2000−2007) |
| GPU code name | Topaz | Rage 6 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 June 2014 (11 years ago) | 14 August 2001 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $799 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
| Compute units | 6 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 940 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 30 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 180 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.52 | 1.098 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7526 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 2 |
| TMUs | 24 | 6 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Floppy |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 183 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 5.856 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VGA, 2x S-Video |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | + | - |
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | N/A |
| Vulkan | - | N/A |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 June 2014 | 14 August 2001 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 180 nm |
R7 M260 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 M260 and Radeon DDR VIVO SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 M260 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon DDR VIVO SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
