ATI FirePro V9800P vs Radeon R7 Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameSpectreCypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2014 (11 years ago)9 September 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121600
Core clock speed720 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed836 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,410 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate23.0468.00
Floating-point processing power0.7373 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2014 9 September 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 225 Watt

R7 Graphics has an age advantage of 3 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 Graphics and FirePro V9800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 Graphics is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V9800P is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Radeon R7 Graphics
ATI FirePro V9800P
FirePro V9800P

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1767 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 Graphics or FirePro V9800P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.