GeForce2 MX vs Radeon R7 (Carrizo)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9711600
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.98no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCarrizoNV11 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2015 (10 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data175 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.7
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)7.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Fortnite 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Fortnite 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 5 3−4 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 9−10 no data

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2015 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R7 (Carrizo) has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 MX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 28 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Carrizo) or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.