R7 (Bristol Ridge) vs HD 7560D

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

HD 7560D
1.18

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 65% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1020855
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.030.24
ArchitectureTerascale 3 (2010−2013)GCN 1.2 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameTrinityBristol Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 September 2012 (11 years old)1 June 2016 (7 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$101 no data
Current price$39 (0.4x MSRP)$80
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has 700% better value for money than HD 7560D.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed760 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors1,303 million2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12-45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.16no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon HD 7560D and Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPno data
WidthIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7560D 1.18
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.95
+65.3%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 65% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD 7560D 458
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
+64.6%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 65% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7560D 4897
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5568
+13.7%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 14% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD 7560D 1076
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1852
+72.1%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 72% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7560D 791
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1013
+28.1%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) outperforms HD 7560D by 28% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD 7560D 6415
+20.8%
R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5311

HD 7560D outperforms R7 (Bristol Ridge) by 21% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+20%
15
−20%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 4−5
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 4−5
Hitman 3 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how HD 7560D and R7 (Bristol Ridge) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • HD 7560D is 20% faster than R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R7 (Bristol Ridge) is 200% faster than the HD 7560D.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R7 (Bristol Ridge) is ahead in 18 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (38%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.18 1.95
Recency 26 September 2012 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

The Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7560D in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7560D is a desktop card while Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Radeon HD 7560D
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 124 votes

Rate AMD Radeon HD 7560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 41 vote

Rate AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.