ATI Radeon 7500 LE vs R7 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking964not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeRV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.500
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data175 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 23 Watt

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 14 years, a 435.7% more advanced lithography process, and 91.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and Radeon 7500 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 LE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
ATI Radeon 7500 LE
Radeon 7500 LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 7500 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) or Radeon 7500 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.