AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) vs Intel HD Graphics 610

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 80$
Games supported 58%
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory 32768 Mb
  • Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 86$
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating783798
Value for money0.240.21
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2015−2016)Gen. 9 Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeKaby Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2016 (6 years ago)1 January 2017 (5 years ago)
Current price$80 $86
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51212
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)12-45 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point performanceno data422.4 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and HD Graphics 610 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.1.103

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1.93
+5.5%
HD Graphics 610 1.83
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 754
+5.9%
HD Graphics 610 712

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5568
+49.9%
HD Graphics 610 3715

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1852
+110%
HD Graphics 610 880

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 5311
+0.6%
HD Graphics 610 5281

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 866
+53%
HD Graphics 610 566

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 1013
+66.7%
HD Graphics 610 608

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 52246
+24.5%
HD Graphics 610 41957

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

R7 (Bristol Ridge) 14
+17.8%
HD Graphics 610 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+114%
7
−114%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3
+50%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 1.93 1.83
Recency 1 June 2016 1 January 2017
Pipelines / CUDA cores 512 12
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 12 Watt 5 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

and

Intel HD Graphics 610
Intel HD Graphics 610

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) from NVIDIA is GeForce 920M, which is slower by 3% and lower by 7 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge):

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 247 ratings

Rate Intel HD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.