GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking959not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.07no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2 (2016)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeGM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speedno data1087 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1239 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data39.65
Floating-point processing powerno data1.269 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.19 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 17 November 2015

R7 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) and GeForce GTX 750 GM206. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 GM206 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
GeForce GTX 750 GM206

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) or GeForce GTX 750 GM206, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.