Iris Plus Graphics vs Radeon R7 A260

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated714
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.90
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameTopazIce Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed980 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate23.5232.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3.6 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2.170-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 A260 and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 A260
Radeon R7 A260
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 474 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 A260 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.