GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs Radeon R7 A260

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTopazG96C
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2014 (12 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed900 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,550 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate23.528.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2416
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed3.6 GB/s800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.2.170N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

R7 A260 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 A260 and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon R7 A260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 A260 or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.