GeForce2 Ultra vs Radeon R7 450 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameCape VerdeNV15 A4
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)14 August 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed925 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million25 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data
Texture fill rate29.602.000
Floating-point processing power0.9472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs328
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Lengthno data183 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz230 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s7.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.21x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.1 (1.2)N/A
Vulkan1.2.170N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 14 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

R7 450 OEM has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 543% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 450 OEM and GeForce2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 228 votes

Rate Radeon R7 450 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 450 OEM or GeForce2 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.