H3C XG310 vs Radeon R7 435 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameOlandDG1
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)11 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320768 ×4
Core clock speed920 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate18.4052.80 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS1.69 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs824 ×4
TMUs2048 ×4
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB ×4
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s68.26 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 11 November 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 300 Watt

R7 435 OEM has 500% lower power consumption.

H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 435 OEM and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 435 OEM is a desktop graphics card while H3C XG310 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 6 votes

Rate Radeon R7 435 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 7 votes

Rate H3C XG310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 435 OEM or H3C XG310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.