Arc Pro A60 vs Radeon R7 435 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.93
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameOlandDG2-256
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed920 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors950 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate18.40262.4
Floating-point processing power0.5888 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs20128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 130 Watt

R7 435 OEM has 160% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 435 OEM and Arc Pro A60. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 435 OEM is a desktop card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 435 OEM
Radeon R7 435 OEM
Intel Arc Pro A60
Arc Pro A60

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon R7 435 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 23 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.