FirePro S9170 vs Radeon R7 430 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameOlandHawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)8 July 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842816
Core clock speed730 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate18.72163.7
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS5.238 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs24176
L1 Cache96 KB704 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s320.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 8 July 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 275 Watt

R7 430 OEM has an age advantage of 11 months, and 450% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9170, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 430 OEM and FirePro S9170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 430 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9170 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 430 OEM
Radeon R7 430 OEM
AMD FirePro S9170
FirePro S9170

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 154 votes

Rate Radeon R7 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate FirePro S9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 430 OEM or FirePro S9170, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.