AMD R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) vs ATI HD 5770

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

ATI HD 5770
4.40
+61.8%

HD 5770 outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 62% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking622763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.66no data
ArchitectureTerascale 2 (2009−2015)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameJuniperKaveri Spectre
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 October 2009 (14 years old)14 January 2014 (10 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$159 no data
Current price$103 (0.6x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800384
Core clock speed850 MHz720 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Wattno data
Texture fill rate34.00no data
Floating-point performance1,360.0 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length208 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed4800 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/Ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI HD 5770 4.40
+61.8%
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 2.72

HD 5770 outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 62% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5770 11699
+59.4%
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 7338

HD 5770 outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 59% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

ATI HD 5770 2410
+21.3%
R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) 1988

HD 5770 outperforms R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) by 21% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Full HD50
+257%
14
−257%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Hitman 3 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how ATI HD 5770 and R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • ATI HD 5770 is 71.4% faster than R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

1080p resolution:

  • ATI HD 5770 is 257% faster than R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the ATI HD 5770 is 400% faster than the R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop).

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI HD 5770 is ahead in 52 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 4.40 2.72
Recency 13 October 2009 14 January 2014
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm

The Radeon HD 5770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Radeon HD 5770
Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 618 votes

Rate ATI Radeon HD 5770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 20 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.