ATI Radeon 9250 vs R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8481588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreRV280
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 January 2014 (11 years ago)1 March 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed720 MHz240 MHz
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.96
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)8.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
God of War 7−8 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Fortnite 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
God of War 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Fortnite 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
God of War 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 9 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 7−8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
God of War 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 21−24 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 6−7 no data
God of War 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 12−14 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
God of War 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2014 1 March 2004
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
ATI Radeon 9250
Radeon 9250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 21 votes

Rate Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 54 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.