ATI Mobility Radeon X300 vs R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking872not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameKaveri SpectreM22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 November 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3846
Core clock speed720 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.400
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0b
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 January 2014 1 November 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) and Mobility Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon X300 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 23 votes

Rate Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop) or Mobility Radeon X300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.