GMA vs Radeon R7 370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
340 OEM 350 350 640SP 350 Fake Card 350 OEM 350X OEM 360 360 896SP 360E 370 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA GMA 500 GMA 600 GMA 900 GMA 950 GMA 3000 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA 3600 GMA 3650 GMA X3000 GMA X3100

Contents

Share:
R7 370 R7 370
GMA GMA

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4681598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.78no data
Power efficiency7.48no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameTrinidadCloverview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speedno data533 MHz
Boost clock speed975 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data
Texture fill rate62.401.066
Floating-point processing power1.997 TFLOPSno data
ROPs321
TMUs642
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length152 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed975 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.6ES 2.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R7 370 4483
+224050%
Samples: 4036
GMA 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46no data
1440p57no data
4K20no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.24no data
1440p2.61no data
4K7.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Escape from Tarkov 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Fortnite 106 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 38 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Escape from Tarkov 42 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Fortnite 41 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 44 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Escape from Tarkov 32 no data
Far Cry 5 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 no data
Valorant 20 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 81 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Escape from Tarkov 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Escape from Tarkov 9−10 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 18 June 2015 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

R7 370 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 370 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 370 is a desktop graphics card while GMA is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 370
Radeon R7 370
Intel GMA
GMA
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 370 Radeon R7 370
vs
HD 7870 XT Radeon HD 7870 XT
GMA GMA
vs
GMA 950 GMA 950
R7 370 Radeon R7 370
vs
GTX 660 Ti GeForce GTX 660 Ti
HD 7970 HD 7970
vs
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
HD 7970 HD 7970
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
R7 370 R7 370
vs
R7 M350 R7 M350
R7 370 R7 370
vs
ATI 3D Rage PRO PCI 3D Rage PRO PCI
R7 370 R7 370
vs
8400 GS 8400 GS
R7 370 R7 370
vs
T500 Mobile T500 Mobile
R7 370 R7 370
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
R7 370 R7 370
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
R7 370 R7 370
vs
RX 9070 GRE RX 9070 GRE
GTX 590 GTX 590
vs
GT 645 OEM GT 645 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 586 votes

Rate Radeon R7 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 370 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.