B200 SXM 192 GB vs Radeon R7 360

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking577not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.61no data
Power efficiency5.70no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell (2024−2025)
GPU code nameTobagoGB100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date18 June 2015 (10 years ago)2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816896 ×2
Core clock speedno data1665 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1837 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million104,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40969.9 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.613 TFLOPS62.08 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1624 ×2
TMUs48528 ×2
Tensor Coresno data528 ×2
L1 Cache192 KB33 MB
L2 Cache256 KB50 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM3e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB96 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed6000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s4.1 TB/s ×2
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
Number of Eyefinity displays6no data
HDMI+-
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
VCE+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model6.3N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-
CUDA-10.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 1000 Watt

R7 360 has 900% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 360 and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 360 is a desktop graphics card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 360
Radeon R7 360
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 720 votes

Rate Radeon R7 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 67 votes

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 360 or B200 SXM 192 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.