AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
not rated
 
not rated
Architecture
GCN 2.0
 
Turing
GPU code name
Tobago
 
TU106
Market segment
Desktop
 
Desktop
Launch date
18 June 2015 (5 years ago)
 
18 June 2020 (less than a year ago)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
896
 
896
Core clock speed
1100 MHz
 
no data
Boost clock speed
no data
 
1590 MHz
Number of transistors
2,080 million
 
10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
85 Watt
 
90 Watt
Texture fill rate
61.60
 
89.04
Floating-point performance
1,971 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
183 mm
 
229 mm
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
 
1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR5
 
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
4 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
 
12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
 
192.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
 
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI
+
 
+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (12_0)
 
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model
6.3
 
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
 
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
 
1.2
CUDA
-
 
7.5

Competitors of Radeon R7 360 896SP from NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon R7 360 896SP from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 660.

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R7 360 896SP:

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 from AMD is Radeon HD 7950.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1650 TU106:

Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

Lower power consumption (85W vs 90W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Much newer (18 June 2020 vs 18 June 2015)

Higher memory bandwidth (192 vs 96 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.