Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 7730 HD 7750 HD 7770 HD 8730 OEM HD 8740 OEM HD 8760 OEM R7 250E R7 250X R7 350 R7 350 640SP R7 450 OEM R9 255 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
T400 Mobile T500 Mobile T600 Mobile T1000 Mobile T1000 Max-Q T1200 Max-Q T1200 Mobile T2000 Mobile T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 350 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R7 350
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
5.12

T1200 Mobile outperforms R7 350 by a whopping 238% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R7 350 R7 350
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.1573.95
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeTU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed800 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6091.20
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264
L1 Cache128 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−263%
58
+263%
1440p9−10
−267%
33
+267%
4K21−24
−286%
81
+286%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how R7 350 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 263% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 267% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 286% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 50 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.12 17.33
Recency 6 July 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 238.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 205.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
Radeon 550 Radeon 550
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
R7 350 Radeon R7 350
vs
HD 7770 Radeon HD 7770
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI 9700 Radeon 9700
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
ATI 3D Rage PRO PCI Rage PRO PCI
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
Quadro4 550 XGL Quadro4 550 XGL
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
GMA GMA
R7 350 AMD Radeon R7 350
vs
R9 280X2 R9 280X2
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
RX 560X RX 560X
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
Pro WX 9200 Pro WX 9200
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 4200
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
ATI X1600 XT Dual Radeon X1600 XT Dual
Quadro P3200 NVIDIA Quadro P3200
vs
RX 6900 RX 6900

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 561 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 159 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.