Quadro 3000M X2 vs Radeon R7 350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.15no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameCape VerdeEXMF104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 July 2016 (9 years ago)22 February 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512240 ×2
Core clock speed800 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate25.6018.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8192 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs3240 ×2
L1 Cache128 KB320 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1125 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s80 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2016 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

R7 350 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 350 and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 350 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 560 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 350 or Quadro 3000M X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.