Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs R7 340 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated456
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.81
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameOlandVega 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)14 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed730 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHz1190 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate18.7276.16
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPS2.437 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2464
L1 Cache96 KB256 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s307.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 14 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

R7 340 OEM has 50% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega 16, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 340 OEM and Radeon Pro Vega 16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 340 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 26 votes

Rate Radeon R7 340 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 340 OEM or Radeon Pro Vega 16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.