Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Radeon R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.71no data
Power efficiency4.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code namePitcairnPonte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102416384 ×4
Core clock speedno data900 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate59.201,638 ×4
Floating-point processing power1.894 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs32no data
TMUs641024 ×4
Tensor Coresno data1024 ×4
Ray Tracing Coresno data128 ×4
L1 Cache256 KB64 MB
L2 Cache512 KB408 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s3,205 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-N/A
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 February 2014 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 2400 Watt

R7 265 has 1500% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 265 and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop graphics card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 387 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 133 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 265 or Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.