CMP 170HX vs Radeon R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking494not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.71no data
Power efficiency4.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code namePitcairnGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (12 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $4,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244480
Core clock speedno data1140 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate59.20394.8
Floating-point processing power1.894 TFLOPS12.63 TFLOPS
ROPs32128
TMUs64280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cache256 KB13.1 MB
L2 Cache512 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1458 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s1,493 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
DDMA audio+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 12N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 February 2014 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

R7 265 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 170HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 265 and CMP 170HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 265 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 170HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
NVIDIA CMP 170HX
CMP 170HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 385 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20 votes

Rate CMP 170HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 265 or CMP 170HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.