ATI Radeon 9600 vs R7 250XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.51
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameCape VerdeRV350
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 August 2014 (11 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed860 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate34.401.296
Floating-point processing power1.101 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz189 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s6.048 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 August 2014 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 12 Watt

R7 250XE has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600, on the other hand, has 566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250XE and Radeon 9600. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250XE
Radeon R7 250XE
ATI Radeon 9600
Radeon 9600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 142 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 250XE or Radeon 9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.