RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs Radeon R7 250XE
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | Cape Verde | AD103 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 21 August 2014 (11 years ago) | 21 March 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 640 | 9728 ×2 |
| Core clock speed | 860 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1680 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,500 million | 45,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 34.40 | 510.7 ×2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.101 TFLOPS | 32.69 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 16 | 112 ×2 |
| TMUs | 40 | 304 ×2 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 304 ×2 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 76 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 9.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB ×2 |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit ×2 |
| Memory clock speed | 1125 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s ×2 |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | - | 8.9 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 August 2014 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
R7 250XE has 87.5% lower power consumption.
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250XE and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R7 250XE is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
