GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R7 250XE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.32
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCape VerdeN17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 August 2014 (11 years ago)1 August 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed860 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1575 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt25 Watt (12 - 29 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate34.40100.8
Floating-point processing power1.101 TFLOPS3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth72 GB/s64.03 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 August 2014 1 August 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX450 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250XE and GeForce MX450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250XE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce MX450 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250XE
Radeon R7 250XE
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GeForce MX450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250XE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1417 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 250XE or GeForce MX450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.