GRID M6-8Q vs Radeon R7 250 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.56
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameOlandGM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 October 2013 (12 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841536
Core clock speed1000 MHz722 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2069.31
Floating-point processing power0.8064 TFLOPS2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs2496
L1 Cache96 KB576 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 October 2013 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

R7 250 OEM has 53.8% lower power consumption.

GRID M6-8Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 250 OEM and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 250 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GRID M6-8Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
Radeon R7 250 OEM
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 62 votes

Rate Radeon R7 250 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R7 250 OEM or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.