Playstation 3 RSX 40nm vs Radeon R7 240 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameOlandRSX-CXD5302
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 November 2013 (11 years ago)4 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Core clock speed730 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6013.20
Floating-point processing power0.4992 TFLOPSno data
ROPs88
TMUs2024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2013 4 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

R7 240 OEM has an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Playstation 3 RSX 40nm, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R7 240 OEM and Playstation 3 RSX 40nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R7 240 OEM is a desktop card while Playstation 3 RSX 40nm is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 40nm
Playstation 3 RSX 40nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 40nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.