RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon R6 M340DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameJetGB205
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 December 2015 (10 years ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845888
Core clock speed955 MHz848 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1605 MHz
Number of transistors690 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data60 Watt
Texture fill rate24.72295.3
Floating-point processing power0.791 TFLOPS18.9 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache96 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R6 M340DX 2681
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile 49410
+1743%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R6 M340DX 1472
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile 36897
+2407%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R6 M340DX 8935
RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile 121098
+1255%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 December 2015 19 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R6 M340DX and RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R6 M340DX is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M340DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 M340DX or RTX PRO 3000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.