RTX A5000 vs Radeon R6 M340DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 M340DX with RTX A5000, including specs and performance data.

R6 M340DX
2015
2.85

RTX A5000 outperforms R6 M340DX by a whopping 1975% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79237
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameJetGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2015 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848192
Core clock speed955 MHz1170 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors690 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate24.72433.9
Floating-point processing power0.791 TFLOPS27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs24256
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1900%
200−210
+1900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1945%
450−500
+1945%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1951%
800−850
+1951%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1945%
450−500
+1945%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1971%
290−300
+1971%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1951%
800−850
+1951%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1900%
180−190
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−1900%
300−310
+1900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1945%
450−500
+1945%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−1900%
240−250
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1951%
800−850
+1951%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1900%
100−105
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1900%
160−170
+1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1900%
140−150
+1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−1959%
350−400
+1959%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1900%
120−130
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1900%
80−85
+1900%

This is how R6 M340DX and RTX A5000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 is 1900% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 59.15
Recency 12 December 2015 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX A5000 has a 1975.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 M340DX in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 M340DX is a notebook card while RTX A5000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
Radeon R6 M340DX
NVIDIA RTX A5000
RTX A5000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 33 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M340DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 279 votes

Rate RTX A5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.