Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M
Combined performance score
Radeon R6 M340DX outperforms GeForce GTX 280M by 93% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 932 | 747 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.16 | no data |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | GCN (2011−2017) |
GPU code name | N10E-GTX | Jet |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 (15 years old) | 3 June 2015 (8 years old) |
Current price | $140 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 704 |
CUDA cores | 128 | no data |
Core clock speed | 585 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1030 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 38 billion/sec | 24.72 |
Floating-point performance | 374.5 gflops | no data |
Gigaflops | 562 | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 280M and Radeon R6 M340DX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
Interface | MXM-IV | IGP |
SLI options | + | no data |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | Up to 950 MHz | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 61 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortLVDSVGA | No outputs |
HDMI | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 5−6
−100%
| 10
+100%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−20%
|
12−14
+20%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−50%
|
6
+50%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3
−33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
−50%
|
3−4
+50%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
This is how GTX 280M and R6 M340DX compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- R6 M340DX is 100% faster than GTX 280M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 280M is 33.3% faster than the R6 M340DX.
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R6 M340DX is 600% faster than the GTX 280M.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 280M is ahead in 1 test (3%)
- R6 M340DX is ahead in 29 tests (91%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.48 | 2.86 |
Recency | 2 March 2009 | 3 June 2015 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | System Shared |
Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
The Radeon R6 M340DX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.