A100 SXM4 vs Radeon R6 M255DX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1029not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameJetGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2014 (11 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3206912
Core clock speed780 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rate17.10609.1
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs20432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cache80 KB20.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2E
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared40 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared5120 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,555 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R6 M255DX and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R6 M255DX is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
Radeon R6 M255DX
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M255DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 M255DX or A100 SXM4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.