RX 6500 XT vs R6 (Kaveri)

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

R6 (Kaveri)
1.78

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1280% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking878203
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Value for moneyno data22.47
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameKaveriNavi 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years old)19 January 2022 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199
Current priceno data$274 (1.4x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed533 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speed654 MHz2815 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data107 Watt
Texture fill rateno data180.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R6 (Kaveri) and Radeon RX 6500 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data143.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R6 (Kaveri) 1.78
RX 6500 XT 24.56
+1280%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1280% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R6 (Kaveri) 691
RX 6500 XT 9516
+1277%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1277% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R6 (Kaveri) 4114
RX 6500 XT 76445
+1758%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1758% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R6 (Kaveri) 1184
RX 6500 XT 22954
+1839%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1839% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R6 (Kaveri) 771
RX 6500 XT 15712
+1939%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1939% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R6 (Kaveri) 5336
RX 6500 XT 91909
+1622%

RX 6500 XT outperforms R6 (Kaveri) by 1622% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−550%
65
+550%
1440p2−3
−1400%
30
+1400%
4K1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1250%
54
+1250%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10100%
102
+10100%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 97
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−3700%
76
+3700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−963%
85
+963%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−750%
34
+750%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9100%
92
+9100%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 89
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Hitman 3 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−713%
65
+713%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1740%
92
+1740%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−650%
30
+650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 82
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−980%
54
+980%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−367%
42
+367%
Metro Exodus 0−1 18
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 18−20
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−620%
36
+620%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1800%
57
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−50%
12
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 12−14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 6
Far Cry 5 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−300%
20
+300%

This is how R6 (Kaveri) and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6500 XT is 550% faster than R6 (Kaveri)

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6500 XT is 1400% faster than R6 (Kaveri)

4K resolution:

  • RX 6500 XT is 1500% faster than R6 (Kaveri)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 10100% faster than the R6 (Kaveri).

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6500 XT surpassed R6 (Kaveri) in all 42 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.78 24.56
Recency 4 June 2014 19 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Kaveri) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Kaveri) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
Radeon R6 (Kaveri)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 14 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R6 (Kaveri) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 2858 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.