Apollo Lake GT1 5 vs Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameSpectre SLApollo Lake GT1 5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 September 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256144
Core clock speed626 MHzno data
Boost clock speed847 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,410 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.02no data
Floating-point processing power0.3205 TFLOPSno data
ROPs83
TMUs1618

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5 (6.0)no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.2.170-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Apollo Lake GT1 5 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics and Apollo Lake GT1 5. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Apollo Lake GT1 5 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Intel Apollo Lake GT1 5
Apollo Lake GT1 5

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 20 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Apollo Lake GT1 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics or Apollo Lake GT1 5, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.