Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded vs R5 (Stoney Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1053not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.26no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeRaven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)19 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192704
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1251 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data55.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.761 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 19 April 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 35 Watt

R5 (Stoney Ridge) has 191.7% lower power consumption.

RX Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) and Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 83 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) or Radeon RX Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.