Radeon HD 6250 IGP vs R5 M435

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking925not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJetLoveland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)9 November 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32080
Core clock speed780 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million450 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data9 Watt
Texture fill rate20.603.200
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.064 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1125 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth36 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 9 November 2010
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M435 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M435 and Radeon HD 6250 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M435 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 6250 IGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M435
Radeon R5 M435
AMD Radeon HD 6250 IGP
Radeon HD 6250 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 119 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6250 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M435 or Radeon HD 6250 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.