ATI FirePro V4800 vs Radeon R5 M435

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking925not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameJetRedwood
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$189

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320400
Core clock speed780 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data69 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6015.50
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.62 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2020
L1 Cache80 KB40 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s57.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 May 2016 26 April 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

R5 M435 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M435 and FirePro V4800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M435 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V4800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M435
Radeon R5 M435
ATI FirePro V4800
FirePro V4800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 118 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 63 votes

Rate FirePro V4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M435 or FirePro V4800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.