Radeon R9 FURY X2 vs R5 M330

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.92no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameExoCapsaicin
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3204096
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz1050 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.60268.8
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs864
TMUs20256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1000 MBps
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan+1.2.170
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M330 and Radeon R9 FURY X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook card while Radeon R9 FURY X2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
Radeon R9 FURY X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1003 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Radeon R9 FURY X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.