Radeon Pro 575X vs R5 M330
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1033 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.05 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) |
| GPU code name | Exo | Polaris 20 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) | 18 March 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 2048 |
| Compute units | 5 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 955 MHz | 1096 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | 5,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.60 | 140.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6592 TFLOPS | 4.489 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 20 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 217.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
| Mantle | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 18 March 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 120 Watt |
R5 M330 has 566.7% lower power consumption.
Pro 575X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M330 and Radeon Pro 575X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 575X is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
