GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs Radeon R5 M330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1017not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.02no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameExoGM206
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (10 years ago)17 November 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz1087 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1239 MHz
Number of transistors690 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.6039.65
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS1.269 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80.19 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
Mantle+-
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 17 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R5 M330 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 750 GM206, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M330 and GeForce GTX 750 GM206. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 GM206 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
GeForce GTX 750 GM206

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1162 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M330 or GeForce GTX 750 GM206, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.